Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2014-06-10 06:49 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2014-06-10 06:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #2716 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2716 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
__________________________________________________
13.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #388.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - this is getting too obvious now, anon ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Re: Respectfully, No.
(Anonymous) 2014-06-11 07:09 am (UTC)(link)As someone who has been diagnosed with a mental illness and was medicated for it, I don't particularly mind the idea of the police having access to that information either. However, I personally am more on the side of restricting access to guns rather than more extensive background checks (you might have noticed, lol), since I think the problem of gun violence extends beyond mass shootings carried by people who are mentally ill. But, you know, each to his own.
But your idea - maybe in the form of a notification you could opt to have, like the ID that diabetics or epileptics have - is interesting.