[ SECRET POST #2716 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2716 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #388.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - this is getting too obvious now, anon ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: School shooting tw

[(Anonymous)]

You are really, really missing the point here. As other anons have said, we have background checks that are almost exactly the same as the one you pasted. The only difference is that the police cannot obtain the information for item d in a background check because it is not legal for them to do so. In Australia, it sounds like they can get that information. Here you can't because we believe that privacy trumps everyone else's safety, it seems.

THAT is the problem here - our mental health and privacy laws are absolute balls on that front. Until we make it legal for the police to do a background check on whether you have been treated for a mental disorder or not, you could just lie about it and they would have no way of checking to be sure.