case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-06-12 06:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #2718 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2718 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Mayim Bialik]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.
[Pacific Rim]











Notes:

Might be another 12 am day. Response time will be slow, sorry.

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 016 secrets from Secret Submission Post #388.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - this is getting spammy now ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-06-13 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
that's not how hard sciences work.

I mean yeah if there isn't enough information about something. But if there is? Then anyone who does their research will come to the same basic conclusion. Otherwise, there's a disconnect somewhere - they didn't research the same thing (which means at least one of them has done an incomplete investigation) or one of them is being illogical in their application of said research.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-13 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
I get that.
(reply from suspended user)

(Anonymous) 2014-06-13 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
No, the science is quite clear that it's unrelated to vaccines.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-13 07:09 am (UTC)(link)
I'm seconding the other anon. We might have several theories as to what causes Autism, but scientists (at least credible ones) are pretty damn sure that vaccines do not cause it.
(reply from suspended user)

(Anonymous) 2014-06-13 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
But the whole point of the secret is that she does have a science education, so the point you're trying to make is irrelevant.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-13 07:19 am (UTC)(link)
Vaccines aren't insidious! The whole autism connection was made by one researcher and one bad study. There is NO connection! How do you people not get this?
(reply from suspended user)
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-06-13 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Aren't we talking about the vaccine side of the debate though? Not the autism side.