case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-06-26 06:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #2732 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2732 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

02.


__________________________________________________


03. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #390.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - spam ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: So what SHOULD we be reading?

(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 12:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. I admit I side-eye people who claim fanfic is of equal quality to published books pretty hard. (The top 1 percent of both? Sure. But unless we're counting self-published books in with the novels, the spread of quality in fanfic is mind-bogglingly huge. The worst of traditionally published novels can't hold a candle to the worst of fic)

But like all things, the fic (and the books!) need to be considered on their own merits.

Re: So what SHOULD we be reading?

(Anonymous) 2014-06-28 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
Naw, child, you ain't seen some of the shit that's made print. Lot of old crappy pulp fiction from back in the day didn't stay in the public consciousness but it's there and it is fabulously bad.