case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-06-29 03:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #2735 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2735 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 061 secrets from Secret Submission Post #391.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-30 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
It's so weird. Those people above mocking OP because they think this is a perfect explanation are missing that the person who feels more sadly about the animal feels worse about that than the infant.

(Anonymous) 2014-06-30 10:13 am (UTC)(link)
Indeed. I get feeling bad about the dog, you're SUPPOSED to feel bad about the dog (that's why it was included, atomic bombs do not discriminate), but the person the OP was criticizing said explicitly that it was as bad (IF NOT WORSE!?) than a terrified mother trying, in her last moments, to protect her infant as both their bodies melted away. I'm not going to say someone has messed up priorities based on their emotional reaction to an anime, such things can't be helped, but I just can't empathize with the 'the dog dying was just as bad!' mindset.