[ SECRET POST #2735 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2735 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 061 secrets from Secret Submission Post #391.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

This! Most people have had a pet die and it's an inevitability every pet owner must accept. Meanwhile, having a child die is the ultimate nightmare scenario and as such, almost unthinkable. Thus it makes sense that people would have a stronger emotional response to a death they have experienced/know they'll have to one day than something they struggle to believe could ever happen to them (and hopefully won't). I'm pretty sure that in a real-life situation where they could save either a pet or a baby, most people who have stronger emotional responses to animals in peril in fiction would still save the baby. It's just that in fiction more relatable situations tend to be more effective.