[ SECRET POST #2736 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2736 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #391.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[cbrachyrhynchos]

Sometimes singing a romantic duet is just singing a romantic duet. I'd put the odds that Ellen DeGeneres is struggling in a relationship with Josh Groban at slim to none.

[(Anonymous)]

oh, i meant when it's been explicitly stated by themselves and all over the press that the song is about their relationship; but i'm not talking about the same people as op anyway.

[intrigueing]

If it's even stated explicitly by them, then it's even *less* likely that they're secretly in love. People who are secretly in love tend not to advertize this fact. People who are extremely confident in the non-romanticness of their relationship, on the other hand, often flirt their asses off.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Or they're not so secretly in love? The other person didn't say who they're talking about but singing about being in love with each other AND telling everyone the song is about them seems like they're not exactly trying to hide it...

[intrigueing]

Oh that's true. I just assumed the reference to "tinhatters" meant that it wasn't something open.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

Given the topic of the thread, you're probably right, but it sounded fairly open to me. It's hard to say for sure without knowing who it is, though.