case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-07-01 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2737 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2737 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 041 secrets from Secret Submission Post #391.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
cushlamochree: o malley color (Default)

[personal profile] cushlamochree 2014-07-01 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the funniest thing about this might be the person who is apparently comparing Catcher In The Rye and Twilight in terms of quality

(Anonymous) 2014-07-02 04:01 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. Honestly, between the two, I'd rather read Twilight than touch Catcher in the Rye again. It was so terrible it actually pissed me off.
cushlamochree: o malley color (Default)

[personal profile] cushlamochree 2014-07-02 06:21 am (UTC)(link)
Well, that wasn't exactly what I was going thinking, but fair enough.

Really, whatever you think of the merits of the two books, it's pretty funny that those are the two books you go to and group together to represent Quality Literature.