Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-07-01 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2737 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2737 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 041 secrets from Secret Submission Post #391.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Sometimes it makes critical conversation impossible
(Anonymous) 2014-07-02 05:33 pm (UTC)(link)There are more problematic characters in the reboot than Uhura, but Uhura is the character who gets the majority of discussion about how terrible she is. Kirk, for example, is much less than he was in the original series, but you see a fraction of the posts about that.
Many people explained that it isn't racism, it's sexism, denying the possibility that it could be both; however, enter Carol Marcus. Although her character does catch some flack, it is still a fraction of the amount that Uhura gets.
Now, people often try to suggest that it is just shipper stuff -- Uhura is disliked because she is with Spock, and many people believe that, but some see it as a racial issue.
I am not trying to suggest that everyone who dislikes the Uhura character is a misogynist bigot, but that their are racial and sexual issues at play that are so ingrained, people refuse to consider them.
Uhura is not as problematic as some others but she gets exponentially more negative discussion. People who live that experience, recognize it when they see it.
Does defensiveness = aggressiveness?
Re: Sometimes it makes critical conversation impossible
(Anonymous) 2014-07-03 12:24 pm (UTC)(link)In each of these cases, most people will gladly consider your opinion and there's no accusations of racism or sexism made. It seems to me that the reason, in large part, that these don't get discussed as much is because almost everyone AGREES that these are flaws in the writing. So there's really nothing to discuss as everyone's in accord.
With Uhura, though, it's the complete opposite. And it's annoying because that same subset of Spuhura fans that will call you racist/sexist at the drop of a hat will also defend the BS that was done to other characters. For example, I've seen them defend Kirk peeping at Carol saying that it wasn't that bad. And I've also seen them suggest that reboot Kirk is better written than TOS Kirk because at least he has a reason to act the way he does given that his dad died. As though Kirk in TOS didn't witness a massacre when he was 13…
And, to be quite honest, I do think that shipping is a big reason. I've been in other fandoms and the way that Uhura's character is twisted in fanfic is basically exactly the same as the way Ron Weasley and Aang's characters were twisted in my other fandoms. It is not at all uncommon to read a fic where Ron is abusive towards Hermione to make way for Harmony or Dramione. Heck, the trope is even called "Ron the Death Eater." And yes it's mean and character bashing, but how the heck do you get misogyny or racism out of that? It's just that people are immature and characters that make up a canon pairing when there's a fanon pairing that's overwhelmingly more popular tend to get bashed.
But unless people are actually saying things that are racist or misogynistic, it feels like that fraction of Spuhura fans is trivializing real issues for a stupid ship war. Being defensive is understandable, but attacking people is not. That's what I mean by aggressiveness. It would be one thing if they defended the writing. But instead they try to shut conversation down by making implications about people and questioning their motives.