case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-07-02 05:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #2738 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2738 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Wizards vs. Aliens]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Hayao Miyazaki]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Dragon Age Inquisition]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Sarah Michelle Gellar and Lena Horne]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Girl Genius]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Dark Souls]


__________________________________________________



08.
[TRON: Legacy]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Phantom of the Opera]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas]








Notes:

Big thunderstorm here, hoping the power stays up. Early to be safe!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #391.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: How would you define a "vintage" fandom?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-02 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
That's interesting, because by that definition Star Trek might not count? Unless you were willing to consider each series its own separate fandom, which is reasonable. Ohhh, and Star Wars wouldn't count, either.

Re: How would you define a "vintage" fandom?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-02 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't call Star Trek vintage, no, because of what you say. And the reboot. But Star Wars...hmmm. Well, I guess yeah, it's vintage.

Re: How would you define a "vintage" fandom?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-02 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
... but the post-2000 sequels AND the planned JJ Abrams episode VII doesn't disqualify it?

Re: How would you define a "vintage" fandom?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-02 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Oh yeah, I'm a moron. :)

Re: How would you define a "vintage" fandom?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-03 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
Haha, no, I was just confused. Both those fandoms are tricky since they ran so long.

Re: How would you define a "vintage" fandom?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-02 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think Star Trek in itself is a vintage fandom, but I'd say that TOS and TNG by themselves count.