fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2738 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2738 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[Wizards vs. Aliens]

__________________________________________________

03.

[Hayao Miyazaki]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Dragon Age Inquisition]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Sarah Michelle Gellar and Lena Horne]

__________________________________________________

06.

[Girl Genius]

__________________________________________________

07.

[Dark Souls]

__________________________________________________

08.

[TRON: Legacy]

__________________________________________________

09.

[Phantom of the Opera]

__________________________________________________

10.

[Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas]

Notes:

Big thunderstorm here, hoping the power stays up. Early to be safe!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #391.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Are you turned on by context-free pictures of genitals? If so, which genitals? (I was originally thinking of men and context-free boobs, but you can answer this for any gender and in regard to any genitals.)

(Please don't post any such pics directly in this thread.)

Edited 2014-07-02 23:28 (UTC)

No, not at all.

No.

Context-free? No. Interacting with other genitals/people/things? Maybe. But mostly I like my porn to be the whole package, because a lot of what turns me on is also body language/facial expressions etc.

Breasts are not genitals!

TRUTH.

but dicks are.

....I think I'll go anon for this one.

Yes, cock, definitely. Provided it's erect. Soft cock does nothing.

Some cocks are just very, very attractive.

I often find pictures of context-free genitals pleasant and enjoyable to look at but I am not actively turned on by them.

This.

Re: A question inspired by some threads on /d/

cloud_riven - 2014-07-03 01:53 (UTC) - Expand

fingalsanteater - 2014-07-03 03:41 (UTC) - Expand

Depends on the genitals I guess but sometimes. I'm not all about the boobs but I still find some pictures of them alluring. I think some labias and penises are nice to look at as well

There's gotta be some action going on with said genitals or it's just a pretty picture to me. I'm turned on by sex, not the vague idea of sex.

Yes, if it's supposed to be an arousing image. (For example, a picture of an erect penis, but not a clinical picture of a flaccid one.)

Nope. Even as a straight woman, dick pics are either hilarious or gross and it doesn't matter WHAT they look like, I'm not turned on.

Well, it depends on the dick, but quite possibly, yes. Especially if it's in vicinity to other genitals (male or female).

Not really. The actual genitals are the least sexy part of sex, to me. I'm much more into the touching, and the secondary sexual characteristics, and the reactions, and the emotions, and really pretty much every other aspect of sex besides the genitals. Cock can occasionally be nice in context, but without all the rest, it's just... awkward. And vulvas have never done much for me visually, in or out of context.

Not even a little. I'm not even turned on by genitals on a person outside of a sexual context.

Got my nudist parents to thank for that one.

Context free, meaning just a picture of a dick, not the rest of the body?

If it's a nice dick, yeah.

As a bi person, context-free vulva does nothing for me, though.

No to any kind, as a bi woman. I need context.

Nope.

Yes. Potentially all genitals (it depends on the specific picture, but I have enjoyed a wide variety for things for a wide variety of genders). My favorites are close-up shots of hardcore genital torture.

Nah. There's got to be context.

(reply from suspended user)

(Anonymous) - 2014-07-03 12:43 (UTC) - Expand