case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-07-03 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2739 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2739 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #391.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
skippydelicious: Derp-Derp (Default)

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

[personal profile] skippydelicious 2014-07-03 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Word.

I have a good guideline as to how to tell if an OC is a self-insert sue. Its that there is an OC in it.

Also it'll be written in present tense. There is no clearer indication that something is going to be sue-tastic insert than a present tense, first person, narration. We all know what book they are, with total lack of imagination, channelling - or more harshly, aping.
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

[personal profile] feotakahari 2014-07-04 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
Er, pardon? I have no clue what book you're talking about.

Personally, I think the biggest clue is when the description doesn't give any indication why an OC would be needed. In the most extreme cases, all the description does is name the OC and call him an OC, without giving any description at all. (That's usually accompanied by referring to a canon character as his wife or girlfriend.)
threeeyedsloth: (Default)

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

[personal profile] threeeyedsloth 2014-07-04 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe Hunger Games? That was written in present tense, wasn't it?

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-04 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
Because only one book ever in the history of writing contained present tense, first person narration. Also, only one book ever in the history of writing contained an author self-insert.
skippydelicious: Derp-Derp (Default)

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

[personal profile] skippydelicious 2014-07-04 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
However the book in question *is* currently the one that has most recently rampaged like a Rhino on Redbull across the cultural consciousness. You can say "well maybe it was something more obscure that influenced them", but then William of Occam is just going to tell you to go and get a shave.

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-04 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
I can think of three first person, present-tense books that are currently very popular and very culturally relevant, two of which are attached to movies that have recently been in theaters and one of which has a movie currently in production.

So, the point stands.

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-04 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
Of course you can, because if you couldn't pull something out your ass then you'd have to concede your point. There has only been one mega-monster that has caused a huge cultural impact. It is Fifty-Shades all the way.

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-04 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
The Hunger Games hasn't had a huge cultural impact? I'd concede on Divergent, but it's still big and relevant atm.
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

[personal profile] feotakahari 2014-07-04 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
Wait, are you talking about Twilight? From your avatar, I assumes you were in the MLP fandom, but I have never read an MLP badfic that had Twilight as an apparent influence. (In MLP, their closest influence actually seems to be James Bond.)
skippydelicious: Derp-Derp (Default)

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

[personal profile] skippydelicious 2014-07-04 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
I'll be honest, while I have no hate for MLP and think that it is okay, I just googled "goofy face" and set the image search to avatar sized. This was the first one that came up.

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-04 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
Twilight is past tense.

Re: What do you hate about your fandoms?

[personal profile] jaybie_jarrett 2014-07-04 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
"I have a good guideline as to how to tell if an OC is a self-insert sue. Its that there is an OC in it. "

If your "bad OC radar" goes off at every OC it sees, I can't take it too seriously.

Just saying. Would you trust a smoke alarm that went off at every breeze or vapor that passed it?



Edited 2014-07-04 03:24 (UTC)