[ SECRET POST #2743 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2743 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 077 secrets from Secret Submission Post #392.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[ill_omened]

It's aimed at Madoka.

Which is hailed by a large fanbase as a "deconstruction of (moe) magical girl anime".

[inkdust]

Ah. The more you know.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not even sure it counts as a magical girl anime. It uses magical girls, but I don't think it belongs to the magical girls genre. Princess Tutu was more of a deconstruction of the genre that Madoka was.

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

I once saw a review of the series that said the creator did not consider it a subversion or deconstruction of magical girls, only that the way it went seemed like the sensible way for it to go.

[(Anonymous)]

Saw that review, I thought he said he wasn't "trying to make" a deconstruction, only that he was trying to tell an interesting story. Minor, minor difference, but I guess it means that he could have looked back on it and thought, "Huh, yeah, I guess I did that, didn't I?"

It's not surprising at all, seeing as a lot of his earlier work was like this.