fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2743 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2743 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

16.

__________________________________________________

17.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 077 secrets from Secret Submission Post #392.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I guess, for me, that I like the PT so much because I feel it's a stupendously well done example of "show, don't tell." I see the characters' behavior and, although the films don't make explicit through dialogue what their motivations are necessarily, I can still trace patterns and events and see how everything fits together.

For Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon, for example, one of the biggest examples I can think of showing that Qui-Gon is a maverick is when Obi-Wan laments to him that if he would just follow the rules he would already be on the Council -- to which Qui-Gon replies that he will do what he must and Obi-Wan still has much to learn. Later on, due to a disagreement about Anakin, Obi-Wan apologizes to Qui-Gon -- but not because he's been persuaded by his way of thinking or thinks he made a mistake -- but because it's "not his place" to disagree with his Master. This really, I think, helps to set up Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan's roles in the story and why Anakin's training goes so awry -- because Anakin is an unusual case that was handed to a very "traditional" Jedi (Obi-Wan) to whom he couldn't connect to as well as Qui-Gon.

As for the dialogue, I honestly don't think it's that bad. It doesn't have the smoothness of finesse of better directors, but I think it fits the environment very well. The awkwardness and stiff formality fits the PT setting in much the same way that the gung-ho attitude fits the OT.

And, although I agree that the OT characters are clean and distinct, they are also much more archetypal than the PT characters. People are much more comfortable with them as a result of that because they feel familiar. But I wouldn't say this means that they are better written necessarily. Same with Indiana Jones. I think the PT, in contrast, has characters that are much more difficult to describe because they don't fit into neat little boxes -- but I don't think that's a bad thing. In fact, to me, that's part of what makes them superior.

And I think there's a great deal of character development -- Obi-Wan going from wet behind the ears padawan to strict master to a Jedi who has loosened up and is more comfortable in his skin. Anakin going from a cheerful (though still somewhat cynical) little boy to an arrogant, displeased teenager, to a neurotic, fearful adult trying to do good. Watching Padmé slip away as her influence wanes with Palpatine's rise. Compare that to the OT where Han Solo basically only has a character arc in ANH -- going from selfish rogue to hero. Or Leia, who is not developed in the slightest (her reactions to Alderaan's destruction and the revelation of Vader as her father are completely glossed over).

I watched the PT first, so maybe I'm biased, but I think people look at them too much through the lens of the OT. And, if that's the case, then I can see how they fall short because they aren't TRYING to be the OT. They're trying to complement and subvert much of the OT. On their own, though, I consider them superior films.

Yeah, I guess I don't have too much more to say, except at the point where you're ascribing stilted, awkward dialogue as an intentional stylistic choice, I'm probably just not going to agree with you. Especially in the PT where it just never plays like a stylistic choice on screen and where it doesn't really vary by characters' profession, relationship with each other, social standing, situation, or whatever. The dialogue is equally stilted, and stilted in the same way, between Anakin and Padme in intimate romantic situations as it is between Obi-Wan and Anakin as close friends, or between members of the Jedi Council talking privately, or between Senators on Coruscant talking publicly, or between Watto and Anakin and Qui-Gon on Tatooine. Even if there's an element of awkwardness to all of those situations, it should at least be varied according to the conditions - a low-class junk-dealer on a backwater planet shouldn't be awkward and stilted in the same way as a political potentate. But they are.

I mean, this is subjective, I can't prove you wrong. And there are times where it makes sense for it to be awkward and stilted. There are moments in the Anakin and Padme relationship where it would be a really logical way to play that relationship to have them be awkward with each other. But there are so many other times when the dialogue is stilted when it doesn't make sense, and where it doesn't seem to come from any logic of the situation, that I just can't read it that way. The Anakin and Padme relationship almost always plays at least somewhat stilted, as does the film's dialogue in general.

RE: characters - I'm fine with characters not fitting into neat little boxes, the problem is when you have characters who just aren't there at all, or who are only there occasionally, which is how I see the PT characters. Character has to show up in the actions and attitudes of the characters on screen, not just in their role in the plot.

Thanks for writing all this though, even if I disagree with you it's been an interesting conversation. Sorry if I've been repetitive and wordy.

[ SECRET POST #2743 ]

Re: Don't feel bad -- I think the PT films are better than the OT

Re: Don't feel bad -- I think the PT films are better than the OT