[ SECRET POST #2747 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2747 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Hobbit/Thorin Oakenshield]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Vincent Black Shadow]


__________________________________________________



04.
[El Goonish Shive]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[Miss Fisher's Murder Mysteries]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.
[Penny Dreadful]


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.
[Supernatural]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Blake's 7]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Edge of Tomorrow/Tom Cruise]


__________________________________________________



16.
[Quirk]


__________________________________________________



17.
[Homestuck]




















18. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________


19. [WARNING for rape]




























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #392.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 2 (tw: rape) - not!secrets ], [ 1 (?) - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - ships it ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

da

I think you mean author's interpretation. And yes, it does.

Wrong

[(Anonymous)]

No, in fact it doesn't. Granted, it's a common misconception, and much beloved of fandom for obvious reasons. But nowhere will you find a genuine (not fourth hand, "I'm sure that's true, I heard it somewhere") academic strain that says the author's intention means *nothing*. It is one of a number of possible things one can get from the text, is all, and has been knocked off its pedestal as the only way to look at and interpret a text.

[(Anonymous)]

No, it doesn't. It means that the author's interpretation has to be considered within its sociocultural context, and that through the act of reading, we share in the creation of a story.

It does not mean that the author doesn't matter; it means that the author is one piece of a whole, and that we mustn't only look at the author's intent when analyzing a text.

[arcadiaego]

No it doesn't, although I usually do anyway.