case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-07-13 05:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2749 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2749 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #393.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-07-14 01:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, this. It confuses me every time the library argument is wheeled out.

Authors are paid per book purchased for libraries, and also each time the book is lent out by a library. Also, there are rules about how many times each physical copy can be lent out before another must be purchased, again giving more revenue to the author.

It's far less than outright sales, but it's still money paid to the writer. It's not by any means "free".