[ SECRET POST #2753 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2753 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 016 secrets from Secret Submission Post #393.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I like you OP. But I don't know why anyone wouldn't understand this - surely there's a clear difference between seeing romantic chemistry/subtext and wanting to explore it.

[silverr]

I think for some people, when you say, "Yeah, I can see where you're getting that [romantic/sexual shippiness] from, but those two just don't click for me that way" -- they only hear the first half of the sentence, and then don't understand why you aren't going where they went with it.

[(Anonymous)]

it sounds like the thinking that shipping is objective, instead of an expression of something personal about the reader. I want my OTP to chose each other, not get together because romantic chemistry naturally results in relationships, ugh...