Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-07-20 04:06 pm
[ SECRET POST #2756 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2756 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 - not!secrets (random images from what appears to be one spammy anon) ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-21 01:08 am (UTC)(link)Most other fandoms come to 'fluff' from an entirely different angle -- it describes the tone of a work entirely, from the idea of being 'light and fluffy.' Which makes a certain amount of sense -- most books, TV shows, anime, or whatever don't have any need for the term 'crunch' because there's no rules or gameplay to them. So without crunch, there's no reason to label the fluff in opposition to it, and that frees up the term for other uses.
And thus we get one term meaning two things due to differing derivations. Language and fandom sure are complicated!
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-22 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
b.) I'm an amateur linguist. I fucking LOVE hearing about cultural context of words, etymologies, history, etc. :) I don't see what's so weird about that version of fun at all. :P