[ SECRET POST #2756 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2756 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 - not!secrets (random images from what appears to be one spammy anon) ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

On the subject of out-of-copyright fandoms, there might be a question of whether it is the vanilla version, or is it fanart of a new, in-copyright versions. Fanart of Sherlock Holmes? Well that's fine if it's the original, but if it's the Holmes from the BBC show Sherlock...

But mostly I agree with the line of thinking that fanart is not a straight-up bootleg.

[littlestbirds]

But you'd be making profit off someone else's ideas either way. Terrible! There's a guy fighting ACDs estate in court right now actually, it's been in the news a bit. Imo ownership and theft are a lot fuzzier for this kind of "property" than OP seems to think.