[ SECRET POST #2759 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2759 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 033 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

Also, I'm not talking about a hypothetical situation where we spy on everyone with guns. I'm talking about a situation where there name is on a list and the list just says 'owns this.' and no one cares about the list unless a crime occurs.

Obv, the government is flawed and that might not work out perfectly, but that doesn't mean the idea itself is a bad one.

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

The idea itself is a bad one because people like the Brady Bunch and a whole bunch of people in Congress who barely know which end of the tube the round exits from want to take them away. You don't see how a database like that could be abused?

Not to mention the costs involved in maintaining it and the giant bureaucracy that would no doubt go along with it, because this is the government we're talking about.

Also, where is the Constitutional authority for a federal database like that?

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

Of course it could be abused! Anything can be abused! But that doesn't mean that the basic core idea isn't a good one.

I can't speak out about how it would work, or the Constitutional authority, I am not educated in those areas.