fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2762 ]

[ SECRET POST #2762 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2762 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

This. The documentary about her writing and releasing DH shows her drawing up a family tree for the Weasley's. When she says Charlie never marries or has children, the documentarian asks if he's gay, and she said something like, "No, Dumbledore's gay" (this was filmed before she made the announcement, actually) "I think Charlie is just much more interested in dragons than anything else".

(I should emphasize that I'm paraphrasing.)

What If Charlie Is Secretly A Furry

*Trans-species otherkin

Dragons are furry? I suppose there is Luck Dragons...

In a world where dragons are real, wouldn't that imply bestiality?

Depends on how sapient they are.

And if Charlie was a dragon Animagus, would it still be bestiality or another type of fucked up?

What happens if a female animagus gets pregnant? What species will the children be?

Reptilian Shapeshifter, clearly.

Like the Queen of England is, you mean?

And George Bush, and Vladimir Putin, and the Pope, and John Travolta...

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2014-07-26 21:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2014-07-26 21:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2014-07-26 21:34 (UTC) - Expand

A lot of Harry Potter is really fucked up if you think about it.

Would that be a Scaly.

Please let that be a thing.

Your wish is granted, those are indeed a thing

Scalies? Definitely a thing, don't you worry

"Interested" in the way that Dumbledore's brother is "interested" in goats, or just kind of the wizard equivalent of a furry who's, like, doodling his dragonsona on parchment in class and yelling "IT'S TOTALLY NOT A PHASE, MOM, IT'S WHO I AM" at Molly and Arthur?

Wait, Aberforth ACTUALLY screwed goats? That wasn't just a kind of hermit joke?

It was heavily implied that yes, he did.

lmao I love how her response to the question 'Is Charlie gay?' is 'No, DUMBLEDORE is gay'

As if gay people are Highlanders and there can only be one in the village at all times

Uh-- I think she was more clarifying that it was Dumbledore, not Charlie that she'd said was gay a few months before, in case the reporter had mixed it up.

Not DUMBLEDORE IS THE ONLY GAY PERSON IN THIS UNIVERSE.

You gotta admit that it sure looks like Dumbledore is the only gay in that universe.

She is definitely... marriage happy, but there are still plenty of other characters that could be potentially gay.

Right, but there's a difference between the author saying that someone is gay, and a fan headcanoning that someone is gay.

Obviously. I'm not trying to argue that there's TOTALLY REPRESENTATION. I was just stating the vibe I got from that statement from JK Rowling wasn't 'Dumbledore is the only gay character, duh!'

LOL. This. Yes, it does feel like that.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only