[ SECRET POST #2765 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2765 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Natalie Dormer]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Punky Brewster (Soleil Moon Frye)]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Interstella 55555]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Longmire]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Dracula Untold]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Transformers Prime]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Rik Mayall]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Scarlett (Starcraft 2)]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Orange is the New Black]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 032 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Secrets like these make me realize that I don't actually understand standards of beauty.

I don't know Natalie Dormer, but the picture just looks like a nice-looking human lady to me. With human features. Where is the rodent supposed to come in?

Not really relevant to your secret, but "X is ugly / X isn't "classically beautiful" secrets always make me feel like I am missing something. It's not that I'm face-blind, it's just. . . most people in media look pretty to me.

[cloud_riven]

Same, except I understand conventional attractiveness even if I don't necessarily find it banging. I find most tv faces to be "safe for consumption", and I don't notice the particularities of the faces unless they really stand out (eg: scars, major cheekbones, crazy eyes, etc.). I can see that for people who do, subtle things pop out, and even bug them.