[ SECRET POST #2767 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2767 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [broken]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Work. Again. Sorry if response time is slow. :(

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big (also random unsubstantiated claims about famous people) ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Okay, I'm not going to argue for this show because it's pretty abysmal. However, you are completely misinterpreting the 9 types of intelligence theory by Howard Gardner. You have it in your mind that someone with high social intelligence flourishes mainly in social environments and likely goes bar hopping and parties until 3 in the morning.

While it is true to some degree that those with high social intelligence will be extroverts, that is not the met qualification. People with high social intelligence have the natural ability to read people and will most likely have the efficiency to work up to a high level position in their specified field and put their ability to good use. Think CIA and FBI investigators who can detect people who are lying just by reading their facial expressions, psychologists who exceed in their field by picking up on subtle social ques of their patients, and groundbreaking social activists like Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi who have the ability to predict the actions of entire communities in order to plan their next moves.

People who qualify as geniuses with social intelligence are practically mind readers. They are more than just sociable.

[(Anonymous)]

There's no "high school intelligence" in Gardner's theory. High school is an education level that requires a mixture of several types of intelligence - most notably math and reading - to get through.

...and no one scores "practical mind reader" on a Gardner test.

[(Anonymous)]

Reading comprehension isn't out of style. No one said anything about "high school intelligence". They were discussing "high social intelligence". Two very different things, anon.

[(Anonymous)]

AYART

Sigh. Auto-correct.

It's still not social intelligence either. It's interpersonal intelligence which is a different thing than having social skills. The ability to see and interpret others' mood is not the same as knowing which fork to use.

[(Anonymous)]

Social intelligence and interpersonal intelligence are interchangeable in many community settings. And yes, your comparison would equate to the same thing, since knowing which fork to use has to do with your knowledge of what standards are used in a community. You draw from your basic to complex knowledge of this to read others in your community - from a single individual to many - to further make successful connections and progress in your field.

[(Anonymous)]

AYART

Social constructs - such as which fork for which situation - are taught. No one is born knowing what a saucer is or the "standards used in your community." It's not a form of intelligence. It's a field of knowledge.

Interpersonal intelligence is something that you're born with. While the ability to read others' moods/needs can be honed or improved (like reading, math, or spacial skills), it's not an arbitrary standard set by whichever group is in charge... unlike social niceties/skills.