[ SECRET POST #2767 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2767 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [broken]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Work. Again. Sorry if response time is slow. :(

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big (also random unsubstantiated claims about famous people) ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[lyriel]

"It doesn't need to be turned into "some anti-worker thing". It already is, although really it's just disgustingly classist."

I am talking specifically about this fictional character. More to the point, I am questioning why the show's writers try to present this character as being likeable, and then consistently show her behaving in an unlikeable manner.

You are going off on some emotion-fueled tangent, full of righteous anger because I supposedly put people down for using welfare or other forms of assistance, which I absolutely and categorically did not.

It is perfectly legitimate to need and use assistance, whether that assistance is formal (the government) or informal (friends and family.)

But a fictional character who uses her looks to get random guys to pay her bills is not an admirable character. That's the point, here.