[ SECRET POST #2767 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2767 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [broken]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Work. Again. Sorry if response time is slow. :(

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big (also random unsubstantiated claims about famous people) ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

'Because of the time it was published in'?

OMG, you make it sound like it was in the Middle Ages and that he'd have been stoned for it... I can guarantee that this was absolutely not the case, even back then.

He would simply have had his books ostracized as 'genre' if he had written books centered on an explicitly homosexual relationship. But that would happen today as well, you only need to look at the reception of 'Brokeback Mountain' to see that...

Whereas by writing about a purely 'platonic' friendship, his books have achieved enduring public acclaim and are highly respected in both historical and literary circles.

[blitzwing]

It was published in the 60's. Brokeback Mountain was published in the 90's. 30 years has made a big difference in attitudes towards homosexuality.