case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-01 06:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #2768 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2768 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Eliza Dushku and Michelle Rodriguez]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Hannibal]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for The Day the Laughter Stopped]
[WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for gore]
http://i.imgur.com/Adz34jx.jpg
[Shaman King]

















Notes:

Staying late at work, day the 3rd. Sorry again.

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 10 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-01 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
And sexuality can be fluid.

For gay TV characters. Straight characters, though? Forget about it.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-01 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
+1

(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
? But I honestly see far, far more instances of taking straight TV characters and writing them as bi or whatever than I do of writing gay characters as "fluid". Am I not understanding your point?

(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 06:37 am (UTC)(link)
The main difference being that those kinds of written sexual... fluidity.... happens to straight characters mostly on fandom spaces whereas with gay characters it happens in canon. Like the example on the OP.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, okay, that makes sense.