case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-01 06:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #2768 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2768 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Eliza Dushku and Michelle Rodriguez]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Hannibal]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for The Day the Laughter Stopped]
[WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for gore]
http://i.imgur.com/Adz34jx.jpg
[Shaman King]

















Notes:

Staying late at work, day the 3rd. Sorry again.

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 10 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-01 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Even in the second case, I don't think there's anything wrong with that. Like, the worst you can say about someone doing that is that they're incorrect (if they're incorrect). There's not something morally wrong about being incorrect about canon. They're just wrong.

If someone is actually claiming that people who disagree with them about canon are bad human beings, then we can start to talk about it being unacceptable.