case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-02 03:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2769 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2769 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #396.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Is it better to be wealthy but not white hansome male or

(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
to be on a poorer side, let's say low middle class, but privileged otherwise.

Re: Is it better to be wealthy but not white hansome male or

(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
In the social production of their existence, men inevitably enter into definite relations, which are independent of their will, namely relations of production appropriate to a given stage in the development of their material forces of production. The totality of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which arises a legal and political superstructure and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness. The mode of production of material life conditions the general process of social, political and intellectual life. It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness.

Re: Is it better to be wealthy but not white hansome male or

(Anonymous) 2014-08-03 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
what

Re: Is it better to be wealthy but not white hansome male or

(Anonymous) 2014-08-03 02:56 am (UTC)(link)
Oh good, I'm not dumb. Or at least I'm in good company.

Re: Is it better to be wealthy but not white hansome male or

(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Wealthy. The connections you can make in that situation tend to override privilege.

Re: Is it better to be wealthy but not white hansome male or

(Anonymous) 2014-08-03 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
Being accepted in your social circle adds a lot to happiness. Good looks make everything 200% easier. So it depends. But money =/= happiness.

Re: Is it better to be wealthy but not white hansome male or

(Anonymous) 2014-08-03 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
It's better to follow the path you feel is best.

Re: Is it better to be wealthy but not white hansome male or

(Anonymous) 2014-08-03 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
I'm presuming you're asking "better" from a material standpoint. In which case, wealthy always trumps. Wealth puts you at the top of the privilege pile.

It depends.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-03 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
Obviously.

In the U.S.? Right now? Wealth can ameliorate a lot of things, and it is really easy for lower middle class to become destitute. One major health crisis can destroy everything.

But, there are times and places where no amount of money helps if you don't check all the right boxes.