case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-05 06:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2772 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2772 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Audrey Tatou, Coco Avant Chanel]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Orange is the New Black]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Recettear]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Mad Men]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Game of Thrones]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Archer]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Kate Beaton's Hark! A Vagrant]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Sleepy Hollow]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Divergent]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 033 secrets from Secret Submission Post #396.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-05 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
this secret totally makes me feel better about the fact that I erase a canon black girlfriend to ship two white characters together. Especially given how much shit I've gotten for it on tumblr…

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-05 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Erasing characters that "get on they way" is really common on most fandoms and imo that's better than bashing them, so *shrugs*

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-05 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess erasing isn't the right word. Normally I just have them amicably break up (usually due to changing circumstances) and then get my ship together. She still appears, but as a minor character more so. And she's still friends with everyone.

I do like her as a character and I've actually read some really good fic featuring her. I'm just WAY too invested in the other ship, unfortunately.

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-05 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I prefer that, too. I hate bashing fic so I prefer it when it's an amicable split. One time I read a fic that described the canon relationship "fizzling out" and I was like yessssssss, perfect. I hate it when fic writers break up the canon couple by just unrealistically "revealing" that the "interloper" is abusive/racist/asshole. I want everyone to get ALONG.

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-05 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'm that way too. If fic starts depicting her as a manipulative shrew, then I nope the fuck out of there. I've also noticed that the quality of the writing is directly related to how well her character and the canon relationship is handled. So if they're broken up unrealistically or she's made OOC, I just close out of the fic. Experience has taught me that the rest of it won't be of good quality.

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-06 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, I like that, too. The fandom I'm in often breaks up one particular canon couple to ship the man with dudes, but the girlfriend is very often present, a good friend to both, and the brains/heart/conscience of the operation. I like the canon couple, but can live with this.

Although I friend-ship Abbie and Ichabod HARD, so I want them both to have other, non-dead or undead, romantic partners.

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-06 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
That's a good thing to do - vastly preferable to making someone evil. I've had canon characters I wanted put aside in favor of a ship, but I can't stand fic that makes someone evil just to accomplish that. Heck, I'd rather see someone tragically killed off or their existence ignored than Sudden, Inexplicable Evil.

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-06 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
It's always unforgivably OOC when it happens, too.

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-05 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Your a terrible human being. Go kill yourself.

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-06 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Come on, are you even trying? That didn't sound self-righteous at all…

I am disappoint, anon.

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-06 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
Go jump off a bridge into shark infested waters wearing concrete shoes.

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-06 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Oh my goodness! I love sharks! I'm so excited! Well, let me unpack my scuba gear. Oh Christ, I can't wait to research tonic immobility.

Good call on the concrete shoes too -- sharks are less likely to attack me if I'm on the ocean floor.

da

(Anonymous) 2014-08-06 02:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Is it sad my first thought is, "shouldn't that have been go jump in a Sharknado?" Ahh, too many bad movies...

Re: Might generate some wank, but...

(Anonymous) 2014-08-06 07:03 am (UTC)(link)
Learn some grammar first. Oh, wait, that'll never happen, because you're (Note) a moron.