fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2772 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2772 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[Audrey Tatou, Coco Avant Chanel]

__________________________________________________

03.

[Orange is the New Black]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Recettear]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Mad Men]

__________________________________________________

06.

[Game of Thrones]

__________________________________________________

07.

[Archer]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Kate Beaton's Hark! A Vagrant]

__________________________________________________

09.

[Sleepy Hollow]

__________________________________________________

10.

[Divergent]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 033 secrets from Secret Submission Post #396.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

But what you are saying there is that it is wrong to be a housewife. And it is not. It is just as okay to be a housewife (or househusband) as it is to work outside the home. What is wrong is pressuring women to be one and judging them for not being one. What is equally wrong is putting less value on being a housewife or saying it is wrong.

It is wrong.

It's a privileged creation of an industrial capatalist society that is not sustainable and leads to women being second class.

Because as much as people may cry and nash their teeth - it's not a real job and belittles any women who spends large chunks of the best years of their life doing it.

Sorry, never going to agree with you on that. Yes, it is a fairly recent phenomena historically and many women (and men) would like to do it and can't. Doesn't make it wrong for a woman who can do it to choose to. It isn't a "job" in the sense of something you do outside the home and get paid for, but it is a vocation.

Lol, you want to talk about privileged creations of an industrial capitalist society and then you want to play like the only role in life that has any dignity is as a jobholder working for a salary in a capitalist economy

It's too hilarious.

This is irrelevant. The only way to combat this trend is to become the other side of the coin in a currency you despise. And there will always be people to "selfish" to care even then.

The only way to combat this trend is to become the other side of the coin in a currency you despise

I think we agree on the actual topic but if your argument is that the only way to "combat this trend" is to somehow become "the other side of the coin" merely by CRITICIZING SOMETHING ON THE INTERNET, that's bullshit.

Anon is allowed to criticize things! They aren't somehow harming women by doing so!

Edited 2014-08-06 00:28 (UTC)

You obviously have never had or cared for children.

u sound white

It's the realest of all jobs on a basic, biological level. Human children tend to get eaten by predators and hit by cars when left on their own. So unless we're aiming for the end of the human race as a SPECIES, then it makes sense to dedicate one parent to monitor the child as close as possible for as long as possible.

True, but before the nuclear family became such a huge thing, usually the parent dedicated to the kids would be grandparents, great aunts and uncles, and so on, because able-bodied younger adults couldn't be spared just to watch the kids without doing any other resource-generating work at all. The ideal of one parent works, other parent watches kids was never very sustainable for most people.

This is a good point.

but - to me, at least - the idea that the only legitimate response is to demand that both parents work, and that in fact this is the only morally acceptable thing to do for society as a whole, is pretty much the most perverse way possible to respond to that change

and second, even in the situation you're describing, the idea that there's a stark division between work inside the home and work outside of it, in terms of necessity for life, existed less than it does now, because there's a significant part of the family unit that's devoted to housework. and it gets even more tenuous of a distinction when you're talking about agricultural societies where it's all melded together. many of the things that you would describe as resource-generating work, or at least necessary work, are things that would be considered housework, in the modern era, and therefore not work at all.

Fuck this noise. >:(

[ SECRET POST #2772 ]

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?

Re: feminists hate tomboys?