[ SECRET POST #2773 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2773 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Maplestory]


__________________________________________________



03.
(Ted and Ralph, The Fast Show)


__________________________________________________



04.
[Big Hero 6]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Law & Order: Criminal Intent]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Arashi no Yoru ni]


__________________________________________________



07. http://i.imgur.com/QnC2dWq.jpg
[Hannibal, linked for nudity and gore]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #396.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[rosefyre]

Pools, yes.

Toddlers? If they do, it's going to be broken, because adding in an entire lifestage that some games have and some games don't is NOT easy. In which case, it will require serious mods to play safely, and even then will likely be broken.

[diet_poison]

hmmmm. I hadn't thought of that; you're right. Unless they have the structure for it in there already, but that seems like way too much trouble for a moneygrab. IDK.

That just leaves me puzzled. Why leave out toddlers and then never include them...? Kinda makes me sad. But I'll deal. If they give babies a little more depth, then I'll be ok with it. (But I don't really want to go from "infant that's coded like an object --> schoolkid" in too short an amount of time, and I also don't like having long infant stages because infants are both boring and high-maintenance. Toddlers just feel like kind of an important part of the process you know?)

ETA: literally right after I left this page I went to Facebook for some end-of-day procrastinating and a video of a baby aging directly up to child came up on my news feed. It's just...weird. I don't like it at all. >:/

[rosefyre]

Yeah, exactly. Sims 2 managed to add in Young Adults, but they're never actually in the same house as the other ages, so it was doable. Toddlers...would be added in.

And yeah, with babies being basically objects (it looks like you can only interact with them directly in front of the crib, which, dude...) and then aging directly to children, it's missing way too much.

[ellensmithee]

I think they do have the base game programmed to allow certain features to be added later in the add-ons. Back when Sims 3 came out, people were looking at the base code and getting all pissed off because it was obviously set up for weather to be added and they felt like they were being cheated.

[diet_poison]

yeahhh. not really surprising there...