case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-14 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #2781 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2781 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Game of Thrones]


__________________________________________________



09. [broken]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Kevin Sorbo/Hercules: The Legendary Journeys]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Transformers: Prime]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Darkchylde]






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #397.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-15 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
So once you make a living off your art, you should have no control over how it's used?

(Anonymous) 2014-08-15 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
DA. Having control over your work does not mean being free from criticism.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-15 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
Once you start selling it, you are opening yourself up to being criticized over it. In fact consumer criticism of commercial works is not only an industry in itself, but considered a vital part of the capitalistic process. Technically, yes, the amateur has just as much right to be publicly criticized too but most critics take the view that there is little to gain from turning critical eyes to amateur works. Even if they deserve it, like Asperchu, it still comes across as just plain bullying. Pros are expected to have a thicker skin.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-15 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)
If you don't have a thick enough skin to accept criticism, perhaps you shouldn't be putting your stuff out in public where people might criticize it? Precious fucking children.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-15 03:58 pm (UTC)(link)
No no, the question should be "so before you make a living off your art, you should be protected from any and all criticism?"

Because fuckin buttsore babies here be all "wahhh don't like don't look" about shit they're posting on PUBLIC FUCKING FORUMS for people to look at, but then turn around to be all "we have a right to criticise art!" about other people's shit.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-15 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
THIS