[ SECRET POST #2781 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2781 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Game of Thrones]


__________________________________________________



09. [broken]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Kevin Sorbo/Hercules: The Legendary Journeys]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Transformers: Prime]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Darkchylde]






Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #397.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[skippydelicious]

The DMCA does not provide for that, that is explicitly outside of the text of the act, if he thought it was harming his reputation then he'd have had to sue them the old-fashioned way (and get his suit thrown out the old-fashioned way too, criticism of works is protected in law). You might not like the criticism, you might not agree with them (you, specifically anonny, obviously don't) but you have no right in law to stifle it. To use a DMCA takedown under false pretenses like he did is just plain unlawful.