case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-19 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #2786 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2786 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Legend of Korra]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Digger]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Transformers: Animated]


__________________________________________________



05.
[World of Warcraft, Warlords of Draenor]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Marvel]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Benedict Cumberbatch]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Orange is the New Black]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Hemlock Grove]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Hardy Boys]


__________________________________________________



11.
[The Remains of the Day]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 033 secrets from Secret Submission Post #398.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-20 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
AYART

I suspect that in order to say such a thing one must have read the source material, which I have not.

But, to be pedantic, your point doesn't disprove my point. In fact, it supports it: there's always another way to interpret a character. I never applied an intrinsic right/wrong value to that statement.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-20 01:29 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Ah, see, the impression I got was that you were saying that all interpretations are valid, and that it's therefore wrong to criticize an interpretation.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-20 03:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I suspect that if I'd meant such a thing, I would have said it. Nevertheless, the fact that you imputed that to my comment explains the comment above yours in which they seem to have done the same thing.