[ SECRET POST #2789 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2789 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Captain America]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Thrilling Adventure Hour, Beyond Belief]


__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Walking Dead]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Fangirl]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Orange is the New Black]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for TWDG]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for abuse, (possibly?) rape]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #398.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - stock photo ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Let's go over the many reasons why this is a really bad analogy:

1. Tigers are living beings that naturally inhabit our ecosystem. They are often endangered, and killing them harms the survivability of the species. We should be concerned about that.
2. Tigers as a species are not overall too dangerous to most humans. They are not a natural threat. Zombies are an unnatural threat, and each one is incredibly dangerous to not just one humans, but every human beyond that via infection.
3. Our current civilization is a place where even when tigers are kept locked up--i.e. zoos--you can trust on the infrastructure of society at large to keep you safe. Tigers are not an inherent threat. Not so with zombies, where your safety has no stability. A tiger locked up in a zoo in this scenario I can easily see being killed for survival purposes.
4. In a similar scenario of a maneating tiger that's ravenous to eat anyone it sees locked up by a maniac who is under their control, and the maniac is at your mercy, what do you choose to do with the tiger? Leave it? For what purpose? It can never be let go, and there's no reason to keep it alive. Do you let it starve? Is this more merciful?