case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-23 03:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #2790 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2790 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #399.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Question:

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Fair enough. But those Junket whores are the journalist, yes? Not the people giving away free shit, yes? The people who are despised are not usually the people looking for good press, right?
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: Question:

[personal profile] feotakahari 2014-08-23 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Like I said elsewhere, I don't actually care about Quinn. The problem, if there is a problem, is with the alleged reviewers.

(Kotaku, at least, is standing by Grayson and claiming he didn't commit any ethics violations. I'll keep this to "alleged" until there's been more time to sift through what's going on.)
dethtoll: (Default)

Re: Question:

[personal profile] dethtoll 2014-08-23 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
It's Nathan Grayson. I wouldn't be surprised.

(then again, I'm showing my bias for hating most of the people who've written for RPS)