case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-23 03:32 pm

[ SECRET POST #2790 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2790 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #399.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
meishuu: (Default)

Re: THANK YOU OP

[personal profile] meishuu 2014-08-24 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
Giving them flaws just in name... like Bella Swan and Anastasia Steele? Yeah, that's pretty much what usually happens. To be honest, I'd rather read about a "perfect" character that acknowledges its perfection than characters like those two.

Re: THANK YOU OP

(Anonymous) 2014-08-24 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
To be honest, I'd rather read about a "perfect" character that acknowledges its perfection than characters like those two

Weirdly, that's why Barbie: Life in the Dreamhouse works for me. Barbie is portrayed as and is acknowledged as being a pretty much perfect and extremely talented person (well, doll), but she's still an interesting character to me and I find her very likable. Of course, the fact that the show is an affectionate parody and very self aware also helps a lot