case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-24 03:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #2791 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2791 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #399.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
dancing_clown: (Default)

Re: Fandom Confessions

[personal profile] dancing_clown 2014-08-24 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I ki d on f lime hearing people's headcanons base on the sour e and subtext they see. But I hate when people treat their interpretations as gospel on what the creators meant. I also hate when interviews are used as canon. To me, canon is what actually appeared in the source material. Everything else is headcanon -- even from creators, until its made its way into the final product.

Re: Fandom Confessions

(Anonymous) 2014-08-25 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
I ki d on f lime hearing people's headcanons base on the sour e and subtext they see.

...what does this sentence mean?
dancing_clown: (Default)

Re: Fandom Confessions

[personal profile] dancing_clown 2014-08-25 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
That sentence means my autocorrect is an asshole, and I kind of like hearing headcanons based on the source and subtext that people see in their media.