[ SECRET POST #2792 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2792 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #399.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Game of Vauge Debates.

[(Anonymous)]

The aim of the game is simple, have a debate, but have no idea what on. When you reply you have to counter one of the points, and all replies must be in the stye of a sort of commentary on the thing that is being debated.
For example:
Person 1: Comment stating the name of a favorite game.
Person 2: Comment arguing that game is bad, citing a badly thought out plot and myriad glitches.
Person 3: Counter that the glitches of the game are part of the joy of the game.
e.t.c.

Yes, you literally type like that.

So, to begin, let's say:

"Statement that author of series clearly doesn't do their research."

Re: Game of Vauge Debates.

[(Anonymous)]

Accusation that other debater is offended by author's work not conforming to that debater's political prejudices.

Re: Game of Vauge Debates.

[(Anonymous)]

Counter that one's personal political associations and/or beliefs are not representative of another's, particularly the author in question, and therefore may be reflected in a manner skewed by the rhetoric and propaganda of said debater's opposing line/s.

Re: Game of Vauge Debates.

[(Anonymous)]

Angry, unnecessarily personal argument that expectation of research is intrinsically unfair and biased.