[ SECRET POST #2795 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2795 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Law & Order: Criminal Intent]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Fred Astaire/Ginger Rogers]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Jeeves and Wooster]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Yahtzee/Zero Punctuation]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Markiplier]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Jackie Chan Adventures]


__________________________________________________



08.
[The Parent Trap]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Alexander]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Starsky and Hutch]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #399.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[kallanda_lee]

Yes, I totally agree on some films being more progressive that people give them credit for! Or, having really interesting subtext that implies the makers want to convey some things but can't do so outright.

And it's a pity because sometimes I see people focus on one tings that bothers them, while they dismiss the 8 thing the movie DID do right.

[sarillia]

I can understand why people focus on the negative when it really bothers them, but I prefer to talk about the good stuff as a way of balancing that out. We need some models for what "right" looks like in addition to pointing out what's wrong.