case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-01 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #2799 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2799 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #400.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-09-02 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
But a roller coaster is created for the purpose of giving someone a physical thrill. (Though they *are* sometimes nice to look at.) Transformers has visual, musical, and story components; even if you think it's not deep enough, it's still art. And what else does "have to mean something" mean if not depth? Like a person might create something on a whim and go "well that looks nice" but they weren't necessarily creating it with the intent of expressing beauty. Or, well, let me put it this way - if a person sold paintings that they didn't particularly find pretty or enjoy making, are they not still art? Even if someone who buys them thinks they're pretty?

It's still human expression.