case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-02 06:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #2800 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2800 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Song of the Lioness]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Genso Suikoden II]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Gordon Ramsay]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Outlast: Whistleblower]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Chris Pine/Zachary Quinto]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Kaizoku Sentai Gokaiger]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Johnny Wander/Lucky Penny]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Daft Punk]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Discworld]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Grant Imahara, Kari Byron and Tory Belleci]


__________________________________________________



13.
[The Hobbit]







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #400.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-02 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
*Sigh* I know it's the Daily Mail, which in general isn't reputable, but don't blame the article for reporting on something that's happening, blame the stupid people throwing a fit. That you seem to equate the writer with the people complaining shows you have no idea how newswork works.

And while this isn't hard-hitting important news, it's still news when arguably one of the BBC's most popular shows is drawing harsh criticism (however idiotic we think that criticism is) from people with a condition.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-02 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Isn't reputable is understating it. Pit of utter bullshit founded on xenophobia and hatred of the BBC might be closer to the truth. Although that will still not capture the hatred for facts or the BBC the Wail has.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
I do blame the Daily Mail for choosing to publish it.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
So, you completely missed the part where its newsworthy. Gotcha.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
Except it's not.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Do you work in the news industry?

(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
Is that a requirement for having an opinion as to what is newsworthy?

(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
It -- or at the very least an education in the field -- is a requirement for understanding how newsrooms determine newsworthiness.

At risk of Godwin.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-03 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
The Daily Mail has managed to avoid printing anything newsworthy since 1938 when they spoke out in favour of that dynamic Austrian chap doing well in cleaning up Germany's streets and economy of that Jewish trash. That was only newsworthy in what it revealed about the Daily Mail, which is probably why they try to avoid printing anything newsworthy. They thought that more countries ought to have his approach, which, broadly speaking, is pretty much what he thought too. Of course, that was back in their moderate days.