[ SECRET POST #2801 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2801 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #400.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[dinogrrl]

You're not the only one. I once spent an entire afternoon reading various rants on the subject. It's like wikipedia, you get lost in the link trails.

I'd prefer not to see 'strong' or 'weak' characters, but well-written ones. Regardless of their gender.

[(Anonymous)]

I like this quote:

"Sherlock Holmes gets to be brilliant, solitary, abrasive, Bohemian, whimsical, brave, sad, manipulative, neurotic, vain, untidy, fastidious, artistic, courteous, rude, a polymath genius. Female characters get to be Strong."

[dinogrrl]

Yeah, that one sticks with me too.

[elephantinegrace]

Do you remember where you saw that quote? It sounds like it might be an interesting read.

[dinogrrl]

Some quick scanning through my links brings up the quote here, but I'm not sure if it's original to that author or not.