[ SECRET POST #2804 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2804 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #401.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - unrelated .gifs ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Depends entirely on how you're defining "queerbaiting" - I understand queerbaiting to mean teasing an audience, specifically slash fangirls, with homoeroticism without ever actually delivering.

However, intentional (if vague) homoerotic subtext? Very possible. 1979 or nothing, intentional homoerotic subtext has been a thing for, oh, thousands of years. Even in a more modern context, it was all the rage in the Renaissance, this is really not new information. I have no opinion about this show in general, but it certainly could have been intentional, at least, nothing in the year is going to demand otherwise.