case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-06 03:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #2804 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2804 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #401.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - unrelated .gifs ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: T'hy'la

(Anonymous) 2014-09-07 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
Err…yes. I'm aware of that. But I just think it's odd to suggest that Roddenberry was treating t'hy'la as a joke given the seriousness he uses in the text.

I'm not saying they MUST be romantic. I'm saying that I think Roddenberry included t'hy'la to show that lover is a valid (a valid, not the only) interpretation of their relationship in canon. That you can see them as friends or brothers or lovers or all three. And the editor's note gave himself an "out" which was kind of necessary given the climate at the time.

I'm not saying that t'hy'la is saying YES THEY'RE 100% CANON AND YOU MUST BELIEVE THIS. I think it's saying "This interpretation of their relationship is perfectly legitimate and equal to seeing them as friends or brothers." That there's nothing wrong with viewing them that way and if you don't want to you don't have to but if you want to, you CAN.

I wasn't suggesting that Roddenberry KNOWS that those passages were romantic, just that with the seriousness he treats their relationship with, I can't imagine him using anything in those passages as a JOKE.