case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-10 09:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #2808 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2808 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Daria]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Hannibal]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Breaking Bad]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Pride and Prejudice]


__________________________________________________



06.
[James May from Top Gear]


__________________________________________________



07.
[GentleWhispering]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Little Women]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Psycho-Pass]


__________________________________________________



10.
[johnny's entertainment / j&a]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 023 secrets from Secret Submission Post #401.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-11 07:55 am (UTC)(link)
Writing that kind of stories was bad and beneath the so called respectable people in their time. I wish people would remember that times and attitudes do change over time. What's okay now might not have been okay in the past.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-11 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-11 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Sure, but we might also remember that Jo is Alcott's self-insert, and that Alcott herself deeply enjoyed writing those stories. She called them her "blood and thunder" stories, and she much preferred writing them to Little Women. But Little Women is what sold, so Little Women is what she wrote.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-13 05:54 am (UTC)(link)
That Alcott did it doesn't still make it socially acceptable, and Little Women and her other similar books were meant for young girls. Of course they wouldnät portray something like that as a fine and good thing to do.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-19 06:19 am (UTC)(link)
Anon, when you're poor and your family is poor and your skill at writing less-than-respectable stories is the only thing keeping food on the table and a roof over their heads, nobody --yes even in that time period!-- who is sensible should be prioritizing the moral repercussions over hello, your family needs to eat.