case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-13 03:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #2811 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2811 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.

__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.

__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #402.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-13 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)
That's... not what I said at all? Excuse me? What?

I mean the public's immediate reaction to news of shootings with no further information and immediate assumption that the police were in the wrong just because the person was unarmed, because "lol police are corrupt," and the strawmanning going on would be mitigated. If people realized there are two sides at all, which a lot of people don't bother to think about, it would lessen the confusion and hate and immediate jumping to conclusions by a lot

I am not literally justifying police officers shooting people. WTF @ you.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-13 08:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, I'm sorry for misreading you then.

In my defense, you said nothing at all about jumping to conclusions. You said that peoples' attitude of "evil cops shooting innocent unarmed people omg" should be mitigated. I don't think it's an unreasonable assumption to think that you're talking about controversies concerning police shootings in general, given that's what you said, but I withdraw my remarks.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-13 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks.

By "evil cops shooting innocent unarmed people omg" what I meant the was the outrage and overreaction and strawmanning, not that shooting people was fine. I tried to get the immediate blindly taking sides across with that, but I guess it didn't work as well as I intended.