case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-13 03:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #2811 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2811 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.

__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.

__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #402.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Have you ever ragequit an online community?

(Anonymous) 2014-09-14 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
AVEN.

The straw that broke the camel's back was a thread basically stating that pedophilia was a legitimate sexual orientation that should be defended, and that pedophiles were an oppressed minority. There were several victims of actual child abuse in that thread who were deeply upset by it.

Apart from that, there was a lot of... I guess, it almost felt like pressuring people to ID as asexual right away.

That, and inventing a million and one labels for every little thing. Last I heard they had stuff like "lithromantic". IDEK man.

Re: Have you ever ragequit an online community?

(Anonymous) 2014-09-14 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
Just looked lithromantic up, and it's just been changed to akoiromantic due to appropiating lesbian culture.

Omigod.

Re: Have you ever ragequit an online community?

(Anonymous) 2014-09-14 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
Yep.

The online asexual community has some serious issues they need to sort out.