[ SECRET POST #2812 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2812 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.

__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.

__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #402.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[ibbity]

A character's being assigned a certain gender does not in any way inherently make them a superior character yo. I've probably read about 5000 books in my lifetime (not an exaggeration, I OWN over 600) and I've never noticed that gender INHERENTLY made a character better or worse, only the way in which that character's personality and behavior was written. Sometimes the character's personality is written so that it depends on tired and annoying gender tropes, but that's the fault of the author not knowing how to write a particular gender as people. Not the fault of the character's having been assigned that gender in itself.