case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-14 03:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #2812 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2812 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.

__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.

__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #402.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-15 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
Anon you've kind of hit on why I have issues with Moffat's writing. It rarely makes sense or falls into line of "what makes sense" in terms of Who. And it's not just that he doesn't follow classic Who, he can't even keep the rules straight from new Who and not just RTD's rules but HIS OWN RULES (see: the weeping angels and their completely random canon.)

I am fine with silly science fiction (science is not my major anyway so you could probably get away with a lot with me) but I still think there needs to be rules as to how a certain world works. Moffat tends to rely way to heavily on thinking the audience either a. doesn't get it b. doesn't care or c. won't remember it. But then I've also read interviews where he openly admits he doesn't do his research.

I really think he's the type of writer who needs an editor to come in and tell him what works and what doesn't. Being a showrunner has not helped his writing skills at all.